Files
Abstract
Despite extensive research measuring broadband quality, limited work has considered the interaction between residential Internet throughput and IP protocol. Public speed tests used to determine Internet quality do not, by and large, control for IP version; results, analysis, and recommendations are made using a hybrid of IPv4 and IPv6 data. Given the range of protocol designs, software stacks, and network infrastructure differences between the protocols, combined with the recent significant increase in IPv6 adoption, it is critical to understand what role the IP protocol plays in measuring Internet speeds.
In this work, we systematically compare IPv4 and IPv6 speeds in residential access networks, examining differences in throughput experienced by households depending on IP version. Our findings demonstrate that IPv4 and IPv6 throughput differ in many instances and motivate a large-scale re-evaluation of our assumptions on IP version in future speed test analysis. Specifically, we find that IPv4 and IPv6 speeds differ in a significant number of cases, with up to 18.3% of our measurements differing by over 5%. Our findings indicate that substantial speed differences between IP versions can be driven by provider-specific factors such as speed tiers. Furthermore, we observe differences in IPv4 and IPv6 data depending on the speed-test software and testing infrastructure. Thus, this work guides future research about Internet speeds on how to consider and control for IP version.