Abstract: Estimating past biodiversity using the fossil record is a central goal of palaeobiology. Because raw estimates of biodiversity are biased by variation in sampling intensity across time, space, environments, and taxonomic groups, sampling standardisation is routinely applied when estimating taxonomic diversity (e.g., species richness). However, sampling standardisation is less commonly used when estimating alternative currencies of biological diversity, such as morphological disparity. Here, we show the effects of standardising fossil time series of morphological disparity to equal sample completeness, or “coverage” of the underlying taxon-frequency distribution. We apply coverage-based standardisation to three published datasets of discrete morphological characters (echinoderms, ichthyosaurs, and ornithischian dinosaurs), and quantify disparity using two metrics: weighted mean pairwise dissimilarity (WMPD) and the sum of variance (SOV). We also compare the effects of coverage-based and sample-size-based standardisation. Our results show that coverage standardisation can yield estimates of disparity through time that dramatically deviate from raw estimates, both in magnitude and direction of changes. These findings demonstrate that future studies of morphological disparity should control for variation in sampling intensity to make more reliable inferences.