Go to main content
Formats
Format
BibTeX
MARCXML
TextMARC
MARC
DataCite
DublinCore
EndNote
NLM
RefWorks
RIS
Cite
Citation

Files

Abstract

Besides firms’ own ones, peer firms' financial disclosures may also affect corporate decision-making. While most existing studies examine how peers’ disclosures influence firms’ investment levels, firms’ risk-taking, which closely correlates to economic stability, remains under-explored. I hypothesize that firms learn important information from their peers’ disclosures, based on which they adjust their risk-taking behaviors. I provide large sample evidence (127,896 firm-year observations) corroborating a negative correlation between peer firms' earnings performance and the focal firm's level of risk-taking. This suggests that when peers disclose outstanding earnings, firms’ fear of competition outweighs their positive expectations of the industry outlook, thus firms tend to be more risk-averse. I also find that compared with over-performing firms, under-performing ones are more risk-loving, which accords with the prospect theory. Finally, I show that under-performing firms are less responsive to peers' earnings in terms of risk propensity because they are always more risk-seeking regardless of the degree of competition.

Details

from
to
Export
Download Full History