Files
Abstract
This paper examines civilian opposition to the Nike air defense system between the mid-1950s and early 1970s in Chicago, Illinois. During the Cold War, the United States Army installed several surface-to-air missile bases in civilian areas in Chicago and other cities across the country in order to defend against a potential Soviet air attack. The Army and their Nike missiles encountered considerable public hostility and resistance from the start, but these efforts changed over time. During the earliest period of opposition to Nike in the mid-1950s, political officials and their constituents in Chicago framed their grievances with Nike as a neighborhood and municipal issue. The loudest objections emerged from the liberal, affluent, and politically organized Hyde Park-Kenwood area. Later, opposition to Nike was imbued with national and international implications when the anti-nuclear movement entered the fray in the late 1950s and early 1960s. By the late 1960s, Chicago’s Nike debate became further entangled with national military policy as the missiles came to be associated with the controversial deployment of anti-ballistic missile systems and the war in Southeast Asia. The Nike debate developed from a local and municipal battle over land use to a conversation about broader American military doctrine. At the same time, certain continuities persisted, with the socioeconomic and political characteristics of the neighborhoods involved informing civilians’ interpretation of Nike throughout the entire 1954-1971 period.