Published December 22, 2014 | Version v1
Journal article Open

The Perception of Naturalness Correlates with Low-Level Visual Features of Environmental Scenes

  • 1. University of Chicago
  • 2. New Mexico State University
  • 3. University of Michigan
  • 4. University of South Carolina

Description

Previous research has shown that interacting with natural environments vs. more urban or built environments can have salubrious psychological effects, such as improvements in attention and memory. Even viewing pictures of nature vs. pictures of built environments can produce similar effects. A major question is: What is it about natural environments that produces these benefits? Problematically, there are many differing qualities between natural and urban environments, making it difficult to narrow down the dimensions of nature that may lead to these benefits. In this study, we set out to uncover visual features that related to individuals' perceptions of naturalness in images. We quantified naturalness in two ways: first, implicitly using a multidimensional scaling analysis and second, explicitly with direct naturalness ratings. Features that seemed most related to perceptions of naturalness were related to the density of contrast changes in the scene, the density of straight lines in the scene, the average color saturation in the scene and the average hue diversity in the scene. We then trained a machine-learning algorithm to predict whether a scene was perceived as being natural or not based on these low-level visual features and we could do so with 81% accuracy. As such we were able to reliably predict subjective perceptions of naturalness with objective low-level visual features. Our results can be used in future studies to determine if these features, which are related to naturalness, may also lead to the benefits attained from interacting with nature.

Data availability

The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. The low-level visual feature data are contained in the Supporting Information files as well as all of the images that were used in the analysis.

Files

journal.pone.0114572.pdf

Files (34.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
Article
md5:cf76747af96205706a0ae2c8394c0dde
2.3 MB Preview Download
md5:fc41c705fcf254a84a75867331192e10
31.9 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0114572
Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:10475

Funding

Tom and Kitty Stoner Foundation
University of South Carolina

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Social Sciences Division
Department(s)
Psychology