Published May 27, 2026 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Online learning of eddy-viscosity and backscattering closures for geophysical turbulence using ensemble Kalman inversion

  • 1. ROR icon University of Chicago
  • 2. ROR icon California Institute of Technology
  • 3. ROR icon Peking University
  • 4. ROR icon University of Wisconsin–Madison
  • 5. ROR icon Google (United States)

Description

This article is part of a Physical Review Collection on the Physics of Changing Climate.

Different approaches to using data-driven methods for subgrid-scale closure modeling of geophysical turbulence have emerged recently. Most of these approaches are data hungry and lack interpretability and out-of-distribution generalizability. Here, we use a hybrid approach that combines turbulence theory, physics-based modeling, and data-driven methods to overcome these challenges. Specifically, we address the parametric uncertainty of well-known physics-based large-eddy simulation (LES) closures: the Smagorinsky (Smag) and Leith eddy-viscosity models (one free parameter) and the Jansen-Held (JH) backscattering model (two free parameters). For various cases of two-dimensional turbulence, optimal parameters are first learned online from data via ensemble Kalman inversion (EKI), such that for each case, the LES energy spectrum matches that of direct numerical simulation (DNS). We quantify the uncertainties on these parameters using a modern machine-learning-accelerated Bayesian workflow, “CalibrateEmulateSample.” Only a small training dataset is needed (to calculate the DNS spectra); i.e., the approach is data-efficient. We find the optimized parameter(s) and their associated uncertainty for each closure to be constant across broad flow regimes that differ in dominant length scales, eddy/jet structures, and dynamics, suggesting that these closures are generalizable. Next, we show that the online learned constants agree with the predictions of a recent semianalytical derivation, providing further interpretability. In both a priori and a posteriori tests that include examining the extreme events, LES with optimized closures, especially with JH, outperforms the baselines (LES with standard Smag, dynamic Smag, or Leith). This work shows the promise of combining advances in theory, physics-based modeling (e.g., JH), and data-driven modeling (e.g., online learning with EKI) to develop data-efficient frameworks for accurate, interpretable, and generalizable closures for geophysical turbulence, with ultimate applications in weather and climate prediction.

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this article are openly available [95,96]; embargo periods may apply.

Files

mnbm-3g56.pdf

Files (2.0 MB)

Name Size Download all
md5:ce07ebcd5df2083c1fb09879359bdcbf
2.0 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Funding

Office of Naval Research
N000142012722
U.S. National Science Foundation
OAC-2005123
U.S. National Science Foundation
AGS-1835860
Schmidt Sciences

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Physical Sciences Division
Department(s)
Geophysical Sciences, Computational and Applied Mathematics