Published January 8, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Enchanted Determinism: Power without Responsibility in Artificial Intelligence

  • 1. University of Chicago
  • 2. New York University

Description

Deep learning techniques are growing in popularity within the field of artificial intelligence (AI). These approaches identify patterns in large scale datasets, and make classifications and predictions, which have been celebrated as more accurate than those of humans. But for a number of reasons, including nonlinear path from inputs to outputs, there is a dearth of theory that can explain why deep learning techniques work so well at pattern detection and prediction. Claims about "superhuman" accuracy and insight, paired with the inability to fully explain how these results are produced, form a discourse about AI that we call enchanted determinism. To analyze enchanted determinism, we situate it within a broader epistemological diagnosis of modernity: Max Weber's theory of disenchantment. Deep learning occupies an ambiguous position in this framework. On one hand, it represents a complex form of technological calculation and prediction, phenomena Weber associated with disenchantment. On the other hand, both deep learning experts and observers deploy enchanted, magical discourses to describe these systems' uninterpretable mechanisms and counter-intuitive behavior. The combination of predictive accuracy and mysterious or unexplainable properties results in myth-making about deep learning's transcendent, superhuman capacities, especially when it is applied in social settings. We analyze how discourses of magical deep learning produce techno-optimism, drawing on case studies from game-playing, adversarial examples, and attempts to infer sexual orientation from facial images. Enchantment shields the creators of these systems from accountability while its deterministic, calculative power intensifies social processes of classification and control.

Files

Enchanted-Determinism.pdf

Files (490.0 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:bad59ce38dddd376b7f6c18880c2e09e
490.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.17351/ests2020.277
Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:6022

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Social Sciences Division
Center(s) or Institute(s)
Institute for the Formation of Knowledge