Published September 16, 2011 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Using boundary layer equilibrium to reduce uncertainties in transport models and CO2 flux inversions

  • 1. University of Chicago
  • 2. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  • 3. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
  • 4. Carnegie Institution of Washington

Description

This paper reexamines evidence for systematic errors in atmospheric transport models, in terms of the diagnostics used to infer vertical mixing rates from models and observations. Different diagnostics support different conclusions about transport model errors that could imply either stronger or weaker northern terrestrial carbon sinks. Conventional mixing diagnostics are compared to analyzed vertical mixing rates using data from the US Southern Great Plains Atmospheric Radiation Measurement Climate Research Facility, the CarbonTracker data assimilation system based on Transport Model version 5 (TM5), and atmospheric reanalyses. The results demonstrate that diagnostics based on boundary layer depth and vertical concentration gradients do not always indicate the vertical mixing strength. Vertical mixing rates are anti-correlated with boundary layer depth at some sites, diminishing in summer when the boundary layer is deepest. Boundary layer equilibrium concepts predict an inverse proportionality between CO2 vertical gradients and vertical mixing strength, such that previously reported discrepancies between observations and models most likely reflect overestimated as opposed to underestimated vertical mixing. However, errors in seasonal concentration gradients can also result from errors in modeled surface fluxes. This study proposes using the timescale for approach to boundary layer equilibrium to diagnose vertical mixing independently of seasonal surface fluxes, with applications to observations and model simulations of CO2 or other conserved boundary layer tracers with surface sources and sinks. Results indicate that frequently cited discrepancies between observations and inverse estimates do not provide sufficient proof of systematic errors in atmospheric transport models. Some previously hypothesized transport model biases, if found and corrected, could cause inverse estimates to further diverge from carbon inventory estimates of terrestrial sinks.

Files

acp-11-9631-2011.pdf

Files (1.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
Supplement
md5:8bacf60ea430d43e497115c021db22cd
233.0 kB Preview Download
Article
md5:0ad056f4bae0080655a84ea32bb608c8
833.7 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.5194/acp-11-9631-2011
Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:13745

Funding

U.S. Department of Energy
DEAC02-05CH11231

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Physical Sciences Division
Department(s)
Geophysical Sciences