Published June 2022 | Version v1
Thesis Open

Evading Forced Migrants' Rights in the EU: Exploring Organizational Evasion through Frontex

Creators

  • 1. University of Chicago

Contributors

Advisor:

Committee member:

Description

Although the EU has a strong legal system to protect human and refugee rights, the "migrant crisis" has produced powerful domestic pressures to violate international refugee law and abrogate the rights of forced migrants. Competing pressures to uphold international refugee law and to violate it have led the EU to evasion. Evasion is a form of bad-faith compliance that describes compliance with the law but not with its purpose. In the case of migration in the EU, I argue that the EU engages in a unique process of evasion that I label as organizational evasion, creating Frontex – an independent agency – to take advantage of structural challenges in pursuing accountability to abrogate the rights of forced migrants. I describe how Frontex's structure is designed to amplify these accountability gaps and power inequalities, and I explore three strategies – rhetorical deconstitution and reframing, migrant pushbacks, and safe third countries – Frontex engages in to evade.

Files

Roth Thesis.pdf

Files (448.2 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:e2d2c77b3ce97e498b154bef5ad9b362
448.2 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:5976

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Social Sciences Division
Department(s)
Committee on International Relations (CIR)