Published November 19, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Machine Learning-Guided Adjuvant Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

Description

Importance: Postoperative chemoradiation is the standard of care for cancers with positive margins or extracapsular extension, but the benefit of chemotherapy is unclear for patients with other intermediate risk features.

Objective: To evaluate whether machine learning models could identify patients with intermediate-risk head and neck squamous cell carcinoma who would benefit from chemoradiation.

Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2016. Patients had resected disease and underwent adjuvant radiotherapy. Analysis was performed from October 1, 2019, through September 1, 2020. Patients were selected from the National Cancer Database, a hospital-based registry that captures data from more than 70% of newly diagnosed cancers in the United States. Three machine learning survival models were trained using 80% of the cohort, with the remaining 20% used to assess model performance. Exposures: Receipt of adjuvant chemoradiation or radiation alone.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Patients who received treatment recommended by machine learning models were compared with those who did not. Overall survival for treatment according to model recommendations was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included frequency of recommendation for chemotherapy and chemotherapy benefit in patients recommended for chemoradiation vs radiation alone.

Results: A total of 33527 patients (24189 [72%] men; 28036 [84%] aged ≤70 years) met the inclusion criteria. Median follow-up in the validation data set was 43.2 (interquartile range, 19.8-65.5) months. DeepSurv, neural multitask logistic regression, and survival forest models recommended chemoradiation for 17589 (52%), 15917 (47%), and 14912 patients (44%), respectively. Treatment according to model recommendations was associated with a survival benefit, with a hazard ratio of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.85; P <.001) for DeepSurv, 0.83 (95% CI, 0.77-0.90; P <.001) for neural multitask logistic regression, and 0.90 (95% CI, 0.83-0.98; P =.01) for random survival forest models. No survival benefit for chemotherapy was seen for patients recommended to receive radiotherapy alone.

Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that machine learning models may identify patients with intermediate risk who could benefit from chemoradiation. These models predicted that approximately half of such patients have no added benefit from chemotherapy.

Files

howard_2020_oi_200850_1605126549.35333.pdf

Files (2.4 MB)

Name Size Download all
Article
md5:c062b3c66f77e5a6cdd87e1953358af8
1.2 MB Preview Download
Supplemental files
md5:7d703b23cc01104e67b20f8de189f232
1.2 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.25881
Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:11165

Funding

National Cancer Institute
U01CA243075
Cancer Research Foundation
Young Investigator Award
University of Chicago
Comprehensive Cancer Center Spotlight grant
Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma Research Foundation
National Institutes of Health
K08-DE026500
National Institutes of Health
R01-DE027445

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Biological Sciences Division
Department(s)
Medicine, Radiation and Cellular Oncology