Published April 8, 2022
| Version v1
Journal article
Open
Evaluation of individual and ensemble probabilistic forecasts of COVID-19 mortality in the United States
Creators
-
Cramer, Estee Y.1
-
Ray, Evan L.1
-
Lopez, Velma K.2
-
Bracher, Johannes3
- Brennan, Andrea4
- Castro Rivadeneira, Alvaro J.1
-
Gneiting, Tilmann5
- House, Katie H.1
- Huang, Yuxin1
- Jayawardena, Dasuni1
- Kanji, Abdul H.1
- Khandelwal, Ayush1
- Le, Khoa1
- Mühlemann, Anja6
-
Niemi, Jarad7
- Shah, Apurv1
- Stark, Ariane1
- Wang, Yijin1
- Wattanachit, Nutcha1
-
Oidtman, Rachel8
- 1. University of Massachusetts
- 2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- 3. Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
- 4. In-Q-Tel
- 5. Heidelberg Institute for Theoretical Studies
- 6. University of Bern
- 7. Iowa State University
- 8. University of Chicago
Description
Short-term probabilistic forecasts of the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States have served as a visible and important communication channel between the scientific modeling community and both the general public and decision-makers. Forecasting models provide specific, quantitative, and evaluable predictions that inform short-term decisions such as healthcare staffing needs, school closures, and allocation of medical supplies. Starting in April 2020, the US COVID-19 Forecast Hub (https://covid19forecasthub.org/) collected, disseminated, and synthesized tens of millions of specific predictions from more than 90 different academic, industry, and independent research groups. A multimodel ensemble forecast that combined predictions from dozens of groups every week provided the most consistently accurate probabilistic forecasts of incident deaths due to COVID-19 at the state and national level from April 2020 through October 2021. The performance of 27 individual models that submitted complete forecasts of COVID-19 deaths consistently throughout this year showed high variability in forecast skill across time, geospatial units, and forecast horizons. Two-thirds of the models evaluated showed better accuracy than a naïve baseline model. Forecast accuracy degraded as models made predictions further into the future, with probabilistic error at a 20-wk horizon three to five times larger than when predicting at a 1-wk horizon. This project underscores the role that collaboration and active coordination between governmental public-health agencies, academic modeling teams, and industry partners can play in developing modern modeling capabilities to support local, state, and federal response to outbreaks.
Data availability
The forecasts from models used in this paper are available from the COVID-19 Forecast Hub GitHub repository (https://github.com/reichlab/covid19-forecast-hub) (4, 34) and the Zoltar forecast archive (https://zoltardata.com/project/44) (35). These are both publicly accessible. The code used to generate all figures and tables in the manuscript is available in a public repository (https://github.com/reichlab/covid19-forecast-evals). All analyses were conducted using the R language for statistical computing (version 4.0.2) (36). We followed the EPIFORGE 2020 guidelines for reporting results from epidemiological forecasting studies (SI Appendix, Table S5) (37).
Files
cramer-et-al-2022-evaluation-of-individual-and-ensemble-probabilistic-forecasts-of-covid-19-mortality-in-the-united.pdf
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2113561119
- Other
- oai:uchicago.tind.io:9686
Related works
- Is supplement to
- https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2304076120 (URL)
Funding
- CDC
- National Science Foundation
- DMS-2027369
- Morris-Singer Foundation
- CDC
- 1U01IP001122
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences
- R35GM119582
- Helmholtz Foundation
- Klaus Tschira Foundation
- Unknown funder
- GM124104
- National Science Foundation
- III-1812699
- Wellcome Trust
- 210758/Z/18/Z
- William W. George Endowment
- Virginia C. and Joseph C. Mello Endowments
- National Science Foundation
- DGE-1650044
- National Science Foundation
- MRI 1828187
- CDC and Council of state and Territorial Epidemiologists
- NU38OT000297
- The Partnership for Advanced Computing Environment at Georgia Tech
- Andrea Laliberte
- Joseph C. Mello
- Richard "Rick" E. and Charlene Zalesky
- Claudia and Paul Raines
- CDC
- Modeling Infectious Diseases in Healthcare
- National Science Foundation
- Expeditions
- National Science Foundation
- CAREER
- National Science Foundation
- Rapid Response Research
- National Science Foundation
- Medium
- National Science Foundation
- Research Traineeship
- CDC
- MInD program
- Oak Ridge National Laboratory
- Georgia Tech
- Georgia Tech Research Institute
- Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation
- The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
- State of Washington and National Science Foundation
- FAIN: 2031096
- Iowa State University
- Plant Sciences Institute Scholars Program
- National Science Foundation
- DMS-1916204
- National Science Foundation
- CCF-1934884
- Laurence H. Baker Center for Bioinformatics and Biological Statistics
- Johns Hopkins University
- National Science Foundation
- RAPID
- National Science Foundation
- RAPID
- State of California
- US Health and Human Services
- US Department of Health Services
- US Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance
- Johns Hopkins Health System
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
- Johns Hopkins University Modeling and Policy Hub
- CDC
- 5U01CK000538-03
- University of Utah
- Immunology, Inflammation, & Infectious Disease Initiative
- Los Alamos National Lab
- Laboratory Directed Research and Development
- CDC
- COVID Supplement
- CSTE
- Cooperative Agreement
- National Science Foundation
- RAPID
- National Science Foundation
- RAPID
- National Science Foundation
- RAPID
- National Science Foundation
- RAPID
- Faculty Award
- Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency
- W31P4Q-21-C-0014
- NIGMS
- R35GM119582
- National Science Foundation
- 1749854
- University of Michigan
- National Science Foundation
- 2035360
- National Science Foundation
- 2035361
- Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
- Rockefeller Foundation