A cross-institutional analysis of the effects of broadening trainee professional development on research productivity
Creators
-
Brandt, Patrick D.1
- Sturzenegger Varvayanis, Susi2
-
Baas, Tracey3
-
Bolgioni, Amanda F.4
-
Alder, Janet5
-
Petrie, Kimberly A.6
- Dominguez, Isabel4
-
Brown, Abigail M.6
- Stayart, C. Abigail7
-
Singh, Harinder8
- Van Wart, Audra9
-
Chow, Christine S.10
-
Mathur, Ambika10
-
Schreiber, Barbara M.4
-
Fruman, David A.8
- Bowden, Brent9
- Wiesen, Christopher A.1
-
Golightly, Yvonne M.1
-
Holmquist, Chris E.1
-
Arneman, Daniel1
-
Hall, Joshua D.1
- Hyman, Linda E.4
- Gould, Kathleen L.6
- Chalkley, Roger6
-
Brennwald, Patrick J.1
-
Layton, Rebekah L.1
- 1. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
- 2. Cornell University
- 3. University of Rochester
- 4. Boston University
- 5. Rutgers University
- 6. Vanderbilt University
- 7. University of Chicago
- 8. University of California, Irvine
- 9. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University
- 10. Wayne State University
Description
PhD-trained scientists are essential contributors to the workforce in diverse employment sectors that include academia, industry, government, and nonprofit organizations. Hence, best practices for training the future biomedical workforce are of national concern. Complementing coursework and laboratory research training, many institutions now offer professional training that enables career exploration and develops a broad set of skills critical to various career paths. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded academic institutions to design innovative programming to enable this professional development through a mechanism known as Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST). Programming at the NIH BEST awardee institutions included career panels, skill-building workshops, job search workshops, site visits, and internships. Because doctoral training is lengthy and requires focused attention on dissertation research, an initial concern was that students participating in additional complementary training activities might exhibit an increased time to degree or diminished research productivity. Metrics were analyzed from 10 NIH BEST awardee institutions to address this concern, using time to degree and publication records as measures of efficiency and productivity. Comparing doctoral students who participated to those who did not, results revealed that across these diverse academic institutions, there were no differences in time to degree or manuscript output. Our findings support the policy that doctoral students should participate in career and professional development opportunities that are intended to prepare them for a variety of diverse and important careers in the workforce.
Data availability
All data used for analyses reported in this paper are available from the Open Science Framework database https://osf.io/qy3pa/.
Files
journal.pbio.3000956.pdf
Files
(4.9 MB)
| Name | Size | Download all |
|---|---|---|
|
Article md5:8d513f15b0def966cdb8c612f096ff40 |
2.4 MB | Preview Download |
|
Supporting information md5:d0aba641a9bd3f6fa27f4ee77f7127cb |
2.4 MB | Download |
Additional details
Identifiers
- DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000956
- Other
- oai:uchicago.tind.io:5950
Funding
- National Institutes of Health
- Biomedical Research Workforce Innovation Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST) Award
- National Institutes of Health
- Biomedical Research Workforce Innovation Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST) Award
- National Institutes of Health
- Biomedical Research Workforce Innovation Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST) Award
- National Institutes of Health
- Biomedical Research Workforce Innovation Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST) Award
- National Institutes of Health
- Biomedical Research Workforce Innovation Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST) Award
- National Institutes of Health
- Biomedical Research Workforce Innovation Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST) Award
- National Institutes of Health
- Biomedical Research Workforce Innovation Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST) Award
- National Institutes of Health
- Biomedical Research Workforce Innovation Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST) Award
- National Institutes of Health
- Biomedical Research Workforce Innovation Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training (BEST) Award
- National Institutes of Health
- General Medical Sciences - Science of Science Policy Approach to Analyzing and Innovating the Biomedical Research Enterprise (SCISIPBIO) Award