Published October 18, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Health care use and spending for Medicaid patients diagnosed with opioid use disorder receiving primary care in Federally Qualified Health Centers and other primary care settings

  • 1. University of Chicago
  • 2. Kaiser Permanente Bernard J. Tyson School of Medicine
  • 3. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services

Description

Introduction: This nationwide study builds on prior research, which suggests that Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) and other primary care providers are associated with increased access to opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment. We compare health care utilization, spending, and quality for Medicaid patients diagnosed with OUD who receive primary care at FQHCs and Medicaid patients who receive most primary care in other settings, such as physician offices (non-FQHCs). We hypothesized that the integrated care model of FQHCs would be associated with greater access to medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD) and/or behavioral health therapy and lower rates of potentially inappropriate co-prescribing.

Methods: This cross-sectional study examined 2012 Medicaid Analytic eXtract files for patients diagnosed with OUD receiving most (>50%) primary care at FQHCs (N = 37,142) versus non-FQHCs (N = 196,712) in all 50 states and Washington DC. We used propensity score overlap weighting to adjust for measurable confounding between patients who received care at FQHCs versus non-FQHCs and increase generalizability of findings given variation in Medicaid programs and substance use policies across states.

Results: FQHC patients displayed higher primary care utilization and fee-for-service spending, and similar or lower utilization and fee-for-service spending for other health service categories. Contrary to our hypotheses, non-FQHC patients were more likely to receive timely (≤90 days) MOUD (buprenorphine, methadone, naltrexone, or suboxone) (Relative Risk [RR] = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.07, 1.12) and more likely be retained in medication treatment (>180 days) (RR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.09, 1.14). However, non-FQHC patients were less likely to receive behavioral health therapy (mental health or substance use therapy) (RR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.88, 0.92) and less likely to remain in behavioral health treatment (RR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.89, 0.94). Non-FQHC patients were more likely to fill potentially inappropriate prescriptions of benzodiazepines and opioids after OUD diagnosis (RR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.30, 1.40).

Conclusions: Observed patterns suggest that Medicaid patients diagnosed with OUD who obtained primary care at FQHCs received more integrated care compared to non-FQHC patients. Greater care integration may be associated with increased access to behavioral health therapy and quality of care (lower potentially inappropriate co-prescribing) but not necessarily greater access to MOUD.

Files

Health-care-use-and-spending.pdf

Files (492.5 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:503d6f6f77dee74acb701b1493303184
27.5 kB Preview Download
Article
md5:8fbe1e7b82ae19ad43cb1ea142fbbd65
465.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1371/journal.pone.0276066
Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:4985

Funding

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
HHSH250201300025I
National Institute on Drug Abuse
R01 DA048176
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
T32 HS000084

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Biological Sciences Division, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice
Department(s)
Medicine, Public Health Sciences, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice Research Publications