Published September 6, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Rebel Motivations and Repression

  • 1. University of Chicago
  • 2. University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

Description

How do different types of motivation influence the politics of collective action? We study a model of endogenous rebellion and repression to understand how different types of individual motivation affect participation, state repression, and the mechanisms by which state violence affects political contention. Unlike psychological rewards, material rewards are divided among successful rebels. Thus, in material rewards settings, repression that decreases mobilization and chances of success also increases participants' share of the rewards, reducing repression's effect. Consequently, materially rather than psychologically motivated groups are less affected by repression and face less repression, but they are also less able to turn early failures into future successes. Moreover, because repression is more effective and used more when rebels are psychologically motivated, rebel motivations are a confounder in estimates of the relationship between repression and mobilization. This can lead to overestimation of repression's effect and to more statistically significant results exactly when repression is more effective.

Files

rebel-motivations-and-repression.pdf

Files (1.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
Article
md5:ecb5a2c109574f1a73457abc089e9dab
518.5 kB Preview Download
Supplementary material
md5:0c2bb4cbe897efc58fe390ff54f5c94d
553.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1017/S0003055422000600
Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:4933

Related works

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Harris School of Public Policy Studies
Department(s)
Harris School of Public Policy Studies Research Publications