Published September 6, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Communicating amounts in terms of commonly used budgeting periods increases intentions to claim government benefits

  • 1. University of Pennsylvania
  • 2. University of Chicago
  • 3. Code for America

Description

Millions of eligible families did not claim their 2021 expanded child tax credit (CTC), collectively forgoing billions of dollars. To address this problem, many policymakers focused on increasing awareness of the CTC by highlighting that families could receive up to 3,600 dollars a year per child. However, people rarely budget on a yearly basis. We propose that communicating the CTC benefit amount in terms of commonly used budgeting periods (e.g., 300 dollars a month) instead of uncommonly used budgeting periods (e.g., 3,600 dollars a year) could increase interest in claiming the CTC. Two large-scale field experiments (n=16,696) among low-income individuals support this account. Using common (vs. uncommon) budgeting periods to describe CTC benefit amounts increased CTC claiming intentions by 16 to 26%. A third large-scale field experiment (n=14,178) demonstrated that encouraging people to consider different budgeting periods moderated these effects. These results suggest that communicating amounts in terms of common budgeting periods is a simple, cost-effective way to stimulate interest in claiming government benefits.

Files

Communicating-amounts-in-terms-of-commonly-used-budgeting-periods-increases-intentions.pdf

Files (1.1 MB)

Name Size Download all
Article
md5:2633c0c17104f65b98956f31ed3036ed
996.6 kB Preview Download
Supporting information
md5:3782278bf21c21957e642b33d0af0308
114.5 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1073/pnas.2205877119
Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:5184

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Booth School of Business
Department(s)
Marketing