Published December 10, 2020 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work

  • 1. University of Chicago
  • 2. European University Institute
  • 3. New York University Abu Dhabi
  • 4. Amsterdam School of Economics

Description

We study whether gender influences credit attribution for group work using observational data and two experiments. We use data from academic economists to test whether coauthorship matters differently for tenure for men and women. We find that, conditional on quality and other observables, men are tenured similarly regardless of whether they coauthor or solo author. Women, however, are less likely to receive tenure the more they coauthor. We then conduct two experiments that demonstrate that biases in credit attribution in settings without confounds exist. Taken together, our results are best explained by gender and stereotypes influencing credit attribution for group work.

Files

Gender-Differences-in-Recognition-for-Group-Work.pdf

Files (1.8 MB)

Name Size Download all
Appendixes A–E
md5:3d7240a0e64eb2c244354e89714ea679
1.2 MB Preview Download
Data archive
md5:6f25244dd0a5d65ff8f9050dcaf7d8d9
71.7 kB Preview Download
Article
md5:b115d4c4130924eb089bdf3ba521d235
496.0 kB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1086/711401
Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:5641

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Booth School of Business
Department(s)
Behavioral Science