Published September 5, 2022 | Version v1
Journal article Open

Moderates

  • 1. University of Chicago
  • 2. University of California, San Diego
  • 3. University of California, Los Angeles
  • 4. George Washington University

Description

Moderates are often overlooked in contemporary research on American voters. Many scholars who have examined moderates argue that these individuals are only classified as such due to a lack of political sophistication or conflicted views across issues. We develop a method to distinguish three ways an individual might be classified as moderate: having genuinely moderate views across issues, being inattentive to politics or political surveys, or holding views poorly summarized by a single liberal–conservative dimension. We find that a single ideological dimension accurately describes most, but not all, Americans' policy views. Using the classifications from our model, we demonstrate that moderates and those whose views are not well explained by a single dimension are especially consequential for electoral selection and accountability. These results suggest a need for renewed attention to the middle of the American political spectrum.

Data availability

Research documentation and data that support the findings in this study are openly available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/THU75A.

Files

moderates.pdf

Files (3.2 MB)

Name Size Download all
Article
md5:5afc7789f8a0827e0a8f4269c7064057
1.2 MB Preview Download
Supplementary materials
md5:6a128b7a4da91a475b490cf68e17be04
2.0 MB Preview Download

Additional details

Identifiers

DOI
10.1017/S0003055422000818
Other
oai:uchicago.tind.io:14045

UChicago Information

Division(s)
Harris School of Public Policy Studies
Department(s)
Harris School of Public Policy Studies Research Publications