@article{TEXTUAL,
      recid = {6333},
      author = {Kardan, Omid and Stier, Andrew J. and Cardenas-Iniguez,  Carlos and Schertz, Kathryn E. and Pruin, Julia C. and  Deng, Yuting and Chamberlain, Taylor and Meredith, Wesley  J. and Zhang, Xihan and Bowman, Jillian E. and Lakhtakia,  Tanvi and Tindel, Lucy and Avery, Emily W. and Lin, Qi and  Yoo, Kwangsun and Chun, Marvin M. and Berman, Marc G. and  Rosenberg, Monica D.},
      title = {Differences in the functional brain architecture of  sustained attention and working memory in youth and adults},
      journal = {PLOS Biology},
      address = {2022-12-21},
      number = {TEXTUAL},
      abstract = {Sustained attention (SA) and working memory (WM) are  critical processes, but the brain networks supporting these  abilities in development are unknown. We characterized the  functional brain architecture of SA and WM in 9- to  11-year-old children and adults. First, we found that adult  network predictors of SA generalized to predict individual  differences and fluctuations in SA in youth. A WM model  predicted WM performance both across and within  children—and captured individual differences in later  recognition memory—but underperformed in youth relative to  adults. We next characterized functional connections  differentially related to SA and WM in youth compared to  adults. Results revealed 2 network configurations: a  dominant architecture predicting performance in both age  groups and a secondary architecture, more prominent for WM  than SA, predicting performance in each age group  differently. Thus, functional connectivity (FC) predicts SA  and WM in youth, with networks predicting WM performance  differing more between youths and adults than those  predicting SA.},
      url = {http://knowledge.uchicago.edu/record/6333},
}